charm AT lists.siebelschool.illinois.edu
Subject: Charm++ parallel programming system
List archive
- From: Phil Miller <mille121 AT illinois.edu>
- To: "Bennion, Brian" <Bennion1 AT llnl.gov>
- Cc: "charm AT cs.uiuc.edu" <charm AT cs.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: Re: [charm] [ppl] current results on LLNL cluster
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:59:12 -0700
- List-archive: <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/charm>
- List-id: CHARM parallel programming system <charm.cs.uiuc.edu>
Two notes:
First, charm++, the runtime system used by namd, is not related to charmm, the force field or the md package built around it. The name similarity is an unfortunate accident of history.
Second, one of my colleagues here at llnl does experimental development directly on ibverbs on lab clusters, so it's definitely doable.
On Sep 8, 2011 10:22 AM, "Bennion, Brian" <Bennion1 AT llnl.gov> wrote:
Hello,
Compilation of all the suggested versions of charm++ have been completed.
They were:
mpi-linux-x86_64
mpi-linux-x86_64 smp
net-linux-x86_64 ivberbs
net-linux-x86_64 ibverbs smp
It appears that the first charmm build is the best for namd2.8. I saw a 25% speedup on my regular jobs using the same processor counts. No extra tricks were employed in compiling charm++ or namd2.8.
The ibverbs version did compile for charm++ and namd2.8 and was even able to start. however, sockets closed prematurely on some node and the whole things burns to the ground.
Two quick thoughts here. First, looking at the charm.XXXXX files that are created, they look for some /tmp/charm.XXXX directories that are not going to be available. The tmp filesystem goes by username it /tmp/bennion1/XXXXX
Second, I will check with our admins to see if using ib layer is even permissible.
Brian
_______________________________________________
charm mailing list
charm AT cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/charm
_______________________________________________
ppl mailing list
ppl AT cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/ppl
- [charm] current results on LLNL cluster, Bennion, Brian, 09/08/2011
- Re: [charm] [ppl] current results on LLNL cluster, Jim Phillips, 09/08/2011
- Re: [charm] [ppl] current results on LLNL cluster, Bennion, Brian, 09/08/2011
- Re: [charm] [ppl] current results on LLNL cluster, Jim Phillips, 09/08/2011
- Re: [charm] [ppl] current results on LLNL cluster, Bennion, Brian, 09/08/2011
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [charm] [ppl] current results on LLNL cluster, Phil Miller, 09/08/2011
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [charm] [ppl] current results on LLNL cluster, Bennion, Brian, 09/08/2011
- Re: [charm] [ppl] current results on LLNL cluster, Abhinav Bhatele, 09/08/2011
- Re: [charm] [ppl] current results on LLNL cluster, Bennion, Brian, 09/08/2011
- Re: [charm] [ppl] current results on LLNL cluster, Jim Phillips, 09/08/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.