charm AT lists.siebelschool.illinois.edu
Subject: Charm++ parallel programming system
List archive
- From: Nicolas Bock <nicolasbock AT gmail.com>
- To: "charm AT cs.uiuc.edu" <charm AT cs.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: [charm] pup() vs. custom packed message
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:13:22 -0700
- List-archive: <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/charm/>
- List-id: CHARM parallel programming system <charm.cs.uiuc.edu>
Hi,
I am looking at section 10.1.3.1, custom packed messages. Why isn't
the pup() framework used here? Aren't pack()/unpack() and pup() doing
the same?
Thanks,
nick
- [charm] pup() vs. custom packed message, Nicolas Bock, 11/14/2013
- Re: [charm] pup() vs. custom packed message, Phil Miller, 11/14/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.