charm AT lists.siebelschool.illinois.edu
Subject: Charm++ parallel programming system
List archive
- From: James Bordner <jobordner AT gmail.com>
- To: charm <charm AT lists.cs.illinois.edu>
- Subject: [charm] Load balancing with Charm++ >= 6.6.1
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:28:35 -0700
Hello,
I have a load balancing test that works with Charm++ versions <= 6.6.0, but with Charm++ >= 6.6.1 I get the following error:
[0] Assertion "n<len" failed in file cklists.h line 221.
------------- Processor 0 Exiting: Called CmiAbort ------------
Reason:
[0] Stack Traceback:
[0:0] CmiAbort+0x5b [0x6a51ea]
[0:1] __cmi_assert+0x42 [0x6af4c3]
[0:2] _ZN5CkVecI9LDObjDataEixEm+0x32 [0x58d928]
[0:3] _ZN6BaseLB7LDStats7getHashERK8_LDObjidRK7_LDOMid+0xd5 [0x636deb]
[0:4] _ZN6BaseLB7LDStats7getHashERK9_LDObjKey+0x47 [0x636ee1]
[0:5] _ZN6BaseLB7LDStats11getSendHashER10LDCommData+0x33 [0x636f17]
[0:6] _ZN9CentralLB27removeCommDataOfDeletedObjsEPN6BaseLB7LDStatsE+0x99 [0x63ede3]
[0:7] _ZN9CentralLB11LoadBalanceEv+0x1ef [0x63cc39]
[0:8] _ZN17CkIndex_CentralLB22_call_LoadBalance_voidEPvS0_+0x30 [0x643dae]
[0:9] CkDeliverMessageFree+0x4e [0x5b05c8]
[0:10] [0x5b070e]
[0:11] [0x5b082a]
[0:12] [0x5b1f0d]
[0:13] [0x5b1fb5]
[0:14] _Z15_processHandlerPvP11CkCoreState+0x126 [0x5b24cc]
[0:15] CmiHandleMessage+0x4d [0x6ac169]
[0:16] CsdScheduleForever+0xad [0x6ac3ea]
[0:17] CsdScheduler+0x16 [0x6ac31b]
[0:18] [0x6aa334]
[0:19] ConverseInit+0x32e [0x6aa7f1]
[0:20] main+0x3f [0x5a0fb2]
[0:21] __libc_start_main+0xf5 [0x7fb33dda8f45]
[0:22] [0x5764ff]
Fatal error on PE 0>
I can provide more details, but thought I'd start by asking if this looks familiar to anyone?
Thanks!
James
I have a load balancing test that works with Charm++ versions <= 6.6.0, but with Charm++ >= 6.6.1 I get the following error:
[0] Assertion "n<len" failed in file cklists.h line 221.
------------- Processor 0 Exiting: Called CmiAbort ------------
Reason:
[0] Stack Traceback:
[0:0] CmiAbort+0x5b [0x6a51ea]
[0:1] __cmi_assert+0x42 [0x6af4c3]
[0:2] _ZN5CkVecI9LDObjDataEixEm+0x32 [0x58d928]
[0:3] _ZN6BaseLB7LDStats7getHashERK8_LDObjidRK7_LDOMid+0xd5 [0x636deb]
[0:4] _ZN6BaseLB7LDStats7getHashERK9_LDObjKey+0x47 [0x636ee1]
[0:5] _ZN6BaseLB7LDStats11getSendHashER10LDCommData+0x33 [0x636f17]
[0:6] _ZN9CentralLB27removeCommDataOfDeletedObjsEPN6BaseLB7LDStatsE+0x99 [0x63ede3]
[0:7] _ZN9CentralLB11LoadBalanceEv+0x1ef [0x63cc39]
[0:8] _ZN17CkIndex_CentralLB22_call_LoadBalance_voidEPvS0_+0x30 [0x643dae]
[0:9] CkDeliverMessageFree+0x4e [0x5b05c8]
[0:10] [0x5b070e]
[0:11] [0x5b082a]
[0:12] [0x5b1f0d]
[0:13] [0x5b1fb5]
[0:14] _Z15_processHandlerPvP11CkCoreState+0x126 [0x5b24cc]
[0:15] CmiHandleMessage+0x4d [0x6ac169]
[0:16] CsdScheduleForever+0xad [0x6ac3ea]
[0:17] CsdScheduler+0x16 [0x6ac31b]
[0:18] [0x6aa334]
[0:19] ConverseInit+0x32e [0x6aa7f1]
[0:20] main+0x3f [0x5a0fb2]
[0:21] __libc_start_main+0xf5 [0x7fb33dda8f45]
[0:22] [0x5764ff]
Fatal error on PE 0>
I can provide more details, but thought I'd start by asking if this looks familiar to anyone?
Thanks!
James
- [charm] Load balancing with Charm++ >= 6.6.1, James Bordner, 07/06/2016
- Re: [charm] Load balancing with Charm++ >= 6.6.1, Phil Miller, 07/06/2016
- Message not available
- Re: [charm] Load balancing with Charm++ >= 6.6.1, Phil Miller, 07/06/2016
- Re: [charm] Load balancing with Charm++ >= 6.6.1, James Bordner, 07/06/2016
- Re: [charm] Load balancing with Charm++ >= 6.6.1, James Bordner, 07/06/2016
- Re: [charm] Load balancing with Charm++ >= 6.6.1, James Bordner, 07/06/2016
- Re: [charm] Load balancing with Charm++ >= 6.6.1, James Bordner, 07/08/2016
- Re: [charm] Load balancing with Charm++ >= 6.6.1, James Bordner, 07/06/2016
- Re: [charm] Load balancing with Charm++ >= 6.6.1, James Bordner, 07/06/2016
- Re: [charm] Load balancing with Charm++ >= 6.6.1, James Bordner, 07/06/2016
- Re: [charm] Load balancing with Charm++ >= 6.6.1, Phil Miller, 07/06/2016
- Message not available
- Re: [charm] Load balancing with Charm++ >= 6.6.1, Phil Miller, 07/06/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.