charm AT lists.siebelschool.illinois.edu
Subject: Charm++ parallel programming system
List archive
- From: Fouzhan Hosseini <F.Hosseini AT leeds.ac.uk>
- To: "charm AT lists.cs.illinois.edu" <charm AT lists.illinois.edu>
- Subject: [charm] Charm++, mpi vs. ibverb build perfomance
- Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 21:54:19 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
I got a bounce email for charm AT lists.illinois.edu, so I am just re-posting here. Sorry, If it is posted multiple times!
Hi all,
Happy new Year!
I have developed a Charm++ application, and tested its performance on our cluster
using both an MPI and ibverbs Charm++ build.
The MPI build is twice slower than ibverbs build. I know ibverbs build should be faster but I was surprised to see it twice faster than MPI build.
Timeline profiling looks very similar for both cases, except one is taking much longer. I also notice that MPI build has a much higher memory usage.
I was wondering whether it is generally expected to see such difference in performance between MPI and ibverbs build or I am using MPI build in a wrong way.
Would you be so kind to share any link/document that explain communication level of charm and its integration with ibverbs/MPI, if there is any? I am wondering why
MPI build has a higher memory usage?
Many thanks,
Research Fellow
School of Computing
University of Leeds
Leeds, LS2 9JT
- [charm] Charm++, mpi vs. ibverb build perfomance, Fouzhan Hosseini, 01/03/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.