charm AT lists.siebelschool.illinois.edu
Subject: Charm++ parallel programming system
List archive
- From: Jozsef Bakosi <jbakosi AT lanl.gov>
- To: charm AT lists.cs.illinois.edu
- Subject: [charm] Projections question
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:07:29 -0700
- Authentication-results: illinois.edu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jbakosi AT lanl.gov; dkim=pass header.d=lanl.gov header.s=lanl; dmarc=pass header.from=lanl.gov
Hi folks,
I have a projections question: I have the following function names when I
hover over "Usage Profile" or "Timeline" plots:
DiagCG::DiagCG_rhs and
DiagCG::redn_wrapper_advance(CkReductionMsg*impl_msg)
The corresponding code is the following (DiagCG is a chare array):
void
DiagCG::dt()
{
// Contribute to minimum dt across all chares the advance to next step
contribute( sizeof(tk::real), &mindt, CkReduction::min_double,
CkCallback(CkReductionTarget(DiagCG,advance), thisProxy) );
}
void
DiagCG::advance( tk::real newdt )
{
// Compute rhs for next time step
rhs();
}
void
DiagCG::rhs()
{
...
}
I would like to know how to interpret the usage (percentage) associated to
DiagCG::DiagCG_rhs and DiagCG::redn_wrapper_advance(CkReductionMsg*impl_msg).
More specifically, what does the latter include in this case? The
communication/synchronization costs of the all-to-all? Does it also involve
what advance() calls, e.g., rhs()?
Please let me know if you need more information.
Thanks,
Jozsef
- [charm] Projections question, Jozsef Bakosi, 12/18/2019
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [charm] Projections question, Ronak Buch, 12/18/2019
- Re: [charm] Projections question, Jozsef Bakosi, 12/18/2019
- Re: [charm] Projections question, Phil Miller, 12/18/2019
- Re: [charm] Projections question, Jozsef Bakosi, 12/19/2019
- Re: [charm] Projections question, Phil Miller, 12/18/2019
- Re: [charm] Projections question, Jozsef Bakosi, 12/18/2019
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.