k-user AT lists.siebelschool.illinois.edu
Subject: K-user mailing list
List archive
- From: Suminda Dharmasena <sirinath AT sakrio.com>
- To: "Rosu, Grigore" <grosu AT illinois.edu>
- Cc: "info AT kframework.org" <info AT kframework.org>, "k-user AT cs.uiuc.edu" <k-user AT cs.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: Re: [K-user] Twelf
- Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 11:41:55 +0530
- List-archive: <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/k-user/>
- List-id: <k-user.cs.uiuc.edu>
Yes.
And also all the infrastructure around the language should be generated from the definition. Also some higher level abstraction of the K syntax it self for reuse and make common usage easy and provide more sugar.
One issue is that since K is in Java means that K is not verified.
Also perhaps K can get its own prover and eliminate the use of Maude and GPL code.
Also a ability to generate a super compiler and tools through constraints from 1 format definition to another would be great.
- Re: [K-user] Twelf, Suminda Dharmasena, 01/01/2014
- Re: [K-user] Twelf, Rosu, Grigore, 01/01/2014
- Re: [K-user] Twelf, Suminda Dharmasena, 01/02/2014
- Re: [K-user] Twelf, Rosu, Grigore, 01/01/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.