maude-help AT lists.siebelschool.illinois.edu
Subject: Maude-help mailing list
List archive
- From: Bartosz Zielinski <bartosz.zielinski AT uni.lodz.pl>
- To: "maude-help AT lists.cs.illinois.edu" <maude-help AT lists.cs.illinois.edu>, Steven Eker <eker AT csl.sri.com>
- Subject: [[Maude-help] ] Odp.: multiple distinct parses for statement
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 22:24:51 +0000
- Accept-language: pl-PL, en-US
- Authentication-results: illinois.edu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bartosz.zielinski AT uni.lodz.pl; dkim=pass header.d=uniwersytetlodzki.onmicrosoft.com header.s=selector1-uni-lodz-pl; dmarc=none
Another possibility is to name constants true and false differently, e.g., tt and ff. Otherwise, the interpreter will not know
if false and true in eq not false = true are constants of sort Boolean or Bool. Finally, one can disambiguate the sorts, i.e., write
(false).Boolean and (true).Boolean instead of false and true.
Bartosz Zielinski
Od: Steven Eker <eker AT csl.sri.com>
Wysłane: poniedziałek, 4 lutego 2019 22:33
Do: maude-help AT lists.cs.illinois.edu
Temat: Re: [[Maude-help] ] multiple distinct parses for statement
Wysłane: poniedziałek, 4 lutego 2019 22:33
Do: maude-help AT lists.cs.illinois.edu
Temat: Re: [[Maude-help] ] multiple distinct parses for statement
By default BOOL is included in every module since it provides things
like the equality test _==_
It also defines true and false and several Boolean operators. If you
want to define your own with the same names you can disable automatic
inclusion of BOOL with the command:
set include BOOL off .
Steven
On 2/4/19 1:18 PM, Liu, Si wrote:
> I think it messed up with the built-in theory.
>
> Try:
>
> fmod BOOLEAN is
> sort Boolean .
> ops t f : -> Boolean [ctor] .
> op not_ : Boolean -> Boolean [prec 53] .
>
> eq not f = t .
> eq not t = f .
> endfm
>
> On 2/4/19 3:12 PM, rainer.mann.rm AT gmx.de wrote:
>> I am leaning Maude from the book "Designing Reliable Distributed Systems" by
>> Peter Csaba Ölveczky, https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="https%3A%2F%2Flink.springer.com%2Fbook%2F10.1007%2F978-1-4471-6687-0&data=01%7C01%7Ceker%40csl.sri.com%7Ce97760d09a30405a925d08d68ae65f5e%7C40779d3379c44626b8bf140c4d5e9075%7C1&sdata=7sV3BC%2BXsxTGMX2aM2Upc57rr5qWiuAftXUj8w05qSM%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> I made a simple specification which is a simplification of an example provided
>> on page 15 of the book.
>>
>> fmod BOOLEAN is
>> sort Boolean .
>> ops true false : -> Boolean [ctor] .
>> op not_ : Boolean -> Boolean [prec 53] .
>>
>> eq not false = true .
>> eq not true = false .
>> endfm
>>
>> Loading this example into maude, I received an error message:
>>
>> Warning: "boolean.maude", line 6 (fmod BOOLEAN): multiple distinct parses for
>> statement
>> eq not false = true .
>>
>> What's going on here?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Rainer
like the equality test _==_
It also defines true and false and several Boolean operators. If you
want to define your own with the same names you can disable automatic
inclusion of BOOL with the command:
set include BOOL off .
Steven
On 2/4/19 1:18 PM, Liu, Si wrote:
> I think it messed up with the built-in theory.
>
> Try:
>
> fmod BOOLEAN is
> sort Boolean .
> ops t f : -> Boolean [ctor] .
> op not_ : Boolean -> Boolean [prec 53] .
>
> eq not f = t .
> eq not t = f .
> endfm
>
> On 2/4/19 3:12 PM, rainer.mann.rm AT gmx.de wrote:
>> I am leaning Maude from the book "Designing Reliable Distributed Systems" by
>> Peter Csaba Ölveczky, https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="https%3A%2F%2Flink.springer.com%2Fbook%2F10.1007%2F978-1-4471-6687-0&data=01%7C01%7Ceker%40csl.sri.com%7Ce97760d09a30405a925d08d68ae65f5e%7C40779d3379c44626b8bf140c4d5e9075%7C1&sdata=7sV3BC%2BXsxTGMX2aM2Upc57rr5qWiuAftXUj8w05qSM%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> I made a simple specification which is a simplification of an example provided
>> on page 15 of the book.
>>
>> fmod BOOLEAN is
>> sort Boolean .
>> ops true false : -> Boolean [ctor] .
>> op not_ : Boolean -> Boolean [prec 53] .
>>
>> eq not false = true .
>> eq not true = false .
>> endfm
>>
>> Loading this example into maude, I received an error message:
>>
>> Warning: "boolean.maude", line 6 (fmod BOOLEAN): multiple distinct parses for
>> statement
>> eq not false = true .
>>
>> What's going on here?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Rainer
- [[Maude-help] ] multiple distinct parses for statement, rainer.mann.rm, 02/04/2019
- Re: [[Maude-help] ] multiple distinct parses for statement, Liu, Si, 02/04/2019
- Re: [[Maude-help] ] multiple distinct parses for statement, Steven Eker, 02/04/2019
- [[Maude-help] ] Odp.: multiple distinct parses for statement, Bartosz Zielinski, 02/04/2019
- [[Maude-help] ] random not found, Rainer Mann, 02/12/2019
- Re: [[Maude-help] ] random not found, Paco Durán, 02/12/2019
- Re: [[Maude-help] ] random not found, Rainer Mann, 02/12/2019
- Re: [[Maude-help] ] random not found, Paco Durán, 02/12/2019
- [[Maude-help] ] random not found, Rainer Mann, 02/12/2019
- [[Maude-help] ] Odp.: multiple distinct parses for statement, Bartosz Zielinski, 02/04/2019
- Re: [[Maude-help] ] multiple distinct parses for statement, Steven Eker, 02/04/2019
- Re: [[Maude-help] ] multiple distinct parses for statement, Liu, Si, 02/04/2019
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.