patterns-discussion AT lists.siebelschool.illinois.edu
Subject: General talk about software patterns
List archive
- From: "Mike Beedle" <beedlem AT e-architects.com>
- To: "'Patterns Discussion'" <patterns-discussion AT cs.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: RE: [patterns-discussion] Alexander makes the NY Times
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 00:41:44 -0500
- Importance: Normal
- List-archive: <http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/patterns-discussion/>
- List-id: General talk about software patterns <patterns-discussion.cs.uiuc.edu>
I wrote:
> Instead of equating them with **relationships** among these things.
Well, in all truth, the above is too restrictive. How come,
no one gripped :-) ?
It is probably closer to relationships among software
things and/or human things, and/or time, and/or ...
any other relevant things; that have the special characteristic
to be a "solution to a problem in a context that balances some
forces", that are part of a pattern language, that describe
a thing and a process to create this thing, that contribute
to the comfort of the people using and developing the
software, etc.
- Mike
"I self-organize therefore I am."
- Mike Beedle
- RE: [patterns-discussion] Alexander makes the NY Times, Mike Beedle, 08/07/2003
- RE: [patterns-discussion] Alexander makes the NY Times, Mike Beedle, 08/13/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.