patterns-discussion AT lists.siebelschool.illinois.edu
Subject: General talk about software patterns
List archive
RE: [patterns-discussion] Using Design Patterns without dynamic memoryallocation
Chronological Thread
- From: "Kencho san" <kenchoweb AT hotmail.com>
- To: ralph_malph AT yahoo.com, patterns-discussion AT cs.uiuc.edu
- Cc:
- Subject: RE: [patterns-discussion] Using Design Patterns without dynamic memoryallocation
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:15:11 +0200
- List-archive: <http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/patterns-discussion>
- List-id: General talk about software patterns <patterns-discussion.cs.uiuc.edu>
I'm not sure what's your problem, but I'll try to answer.
Almost any non-creational pattern can be aplied without dynamic memory allocation, for instance the template method, state pattern, facade, adapter... all of them can make use of composition-like relationships rather than reference relationships (note that reference doesn't mean dynamic memory allocation, but usually involves it)
If your problem is about design patterns helping you avoid dynamic memory allocation (you have space for a maximum amount of objects and can't waste time or memory to store more...), I would suggest taking a look to the Object Pool pattern, which is a very clever way to reuse already existing objects instead of creating and destroying them constantly
Hope that helps
Hello all, looking at archives I'm not sure how
"alive" this list is, but someone out there might be
listening.
I'm interested in people's opinions as to whether
design patterns would be useful if you could not
dynamically allocate memory.
I am new to patterns and find them quite interesting.
I am considering putting in some effort to comprehend
them, but my projects at work include embedded
safety-critical real-time systems, and one of the
things that we do not use is dynamic memory
allocation.
If anyone has an opinion as to whether I should delve
into patterns for this type of software (i.e. you have
considered doing them and/or done them in similar
systems before) I'd be interested to hear it.
Thanks!
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
_______________________________________________
patterns-discussion mailing list
patterns-discussion AT cs.uiuc.edu
http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/patterns-discussion
- [patterns-discussion] Using Design Patterns without dynamic memory allocation, Ralph Malph, 03/28/2005
- Message not available
- Re: [patterns-discussion] Using Design Patterns without dynamic memory allocation, Linda Rising, 03/28/2005
- RE: [patterns-discussion] Using Design Patterns without dynamic memoryallocation, Kencho san, 03/29/2005
- Re: [patterns-discussion] Using Design Patterns without dynamic memoryallocation, Michael J. Pont, 03/29/2005
- Re: [patterns-discussion] Using Design Patterns without dynamic memory allocation, Russ Rufer, 03/29/2005
- Message not available
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.