patterns-discussion AT lists.siebelschool.illinois.edu

Subject: General talk about software patterns

List archive

From: Jesús Alonso <kenchoweb AT hotmail.com>
To: james.siddle AT siemens.com, patterns-discussion AT cs.uiuc.edu
Cc:
Subject: RE: [patterns-discussion] Lightweight data management patterns
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 14:40:34 +0200
List-archive: <http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/patterns-discussion>
List-id: General talk about software patterns <patterns-discussion.cs.uiuc.edu>

Hi. At a first glance, I can identify these:

- Fast data access

Pool the connections or file streams: Object Pool pattern.

- Single point of access (programmatically)

Singleton or Monostate could do the work

- Simple, easy to use interface

Facade and or Adaptor patterns (wrapping)

- Access control

Can't remember now...

- Data profiles

The same

- Data Location transparency

I think you talk about independency of the storage system (file, database...) Patterns like Abstract Factory could help the task

- Caching

Again the Objects Pool pattern and the Proxy pattern might be useful

- Change notification / Replication

I don't understand what you mean about this...

[patterns-discussion] Lightweight data management patterns, Siddle, James, 06/02/2005
- RE: [patterns-discussion] Lightweight data management patterns, Jesús Alonso, 06/02/2005
- RE: [patterns-discussion] Lightweight data management patterns, Phillip A. Lindsay, 06/02/2005
- Re: [patterns-discussion] Lightweight data management patterns, Allan Halme, 06/03/2005