Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

patterns-discussion - [patterns-discussion] MDP feasibility questions (was: Messaging Design Patterns (MDP) reusability and QA)

patterns-discussion AT lists.siebelschool.illinois.edu

Subject: General talk about software patterns

List archive

[patterns-discussion] MDP feasibility questions (was: Messaging Design Patterns (MDP) reusability and QA)


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Al Boldi <a1426z AT gawab.com>
  • To: Messaging Design Pattern <dsheppard2k AT yahoo.com>
  • Cc: patterns-discussion AT cs.uiuc.edu
  • Subject: [patterns-discussion] MDP feasibility questions (was: Messaging Design Patterns (MDP) reusability and QA)
  • Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 18:46:43 +0300
  • List-archive: <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/patterns-discussion>
  • List-id: General talk about software patterns <patterns-discussion.cs.uiuc.edu>

Messaging Design Pattern
<dsheppard2k AT yahoo.com>
wrote:
> I'm glad that the real world analogies served their purpose. At the very
> least they encouraged the reader to think in terms of a realistic software
> model (based on messaging) that mimics the world around us. The main goal
> of this discussion is the to clarify or expand on specific points not
> covered by the paper.
>
> In terms of reusability, there are several areas where the messaging
> design pattern (MDP) provides improvements:

Can the MDP be used to replace the Observer Design Pattern?

If so, would the system be easier or harder to implement in the long-run?

What about performance and resource usage?

When is the MDP applicable, and when is it not applicable?


Thanks!

--
Al





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page