General talk about software patterns

[Messaging Design Pattern <dsheppard2k AT yahoo.com>]

Again, I don't intend to be rude/mean or anything. I'm afraid that if we want to be part of a serious and professional discussion based on scientific and logical concepts, we obviously need to make a clear and complete argument (or question). Commenting without understanding >the complete document< seems premature (risky): "not enough information associations/concepts  to make  informed/logical decisions regarding the matter being studied". Easy way to miss information and be wrong.

The message requesting feedback was very clear:

"Also, I would appreciate it if you could keep making your questions/comments as specific as possible. This allows me to send appropriate  responses. Feel free to quote specific sections of the draft."

These 'concepts' should be fairly obvious. Also keep in mind that this is a draft (looking for feedback).  BTW, No point in becoming too personal (emotional) about matters that are factual/logical/mathematical in nature. It is good to hear that I didn't make the R-pile (rude pile) then I would be really worried: ;-). You see, "polite" is a good/obvious concept when dealing with others. Direct/Straightforward messaging is also best.

In summary, let's focus on the 'Concepts' presented by the paper based on logical/rational arguments, discussion and questions (obviously).

Regards,

Al