Svadev mailing list

[Arushi Aggarwal <arushi987 AT gmail.com>]

No. The callgraph in CBU is not correct for func.

Arushi

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:24 AM, John Criswell <criswell AT illinois.edu> wrote:

 On 10/19/10 12:23 AM, Arushi Aggarwal wrote:
> In the given C++ example, the indirect function call site in main is
> resolved, after BU as the information about the object is merged back
> into main's graph.
> The same call sequence in func, does not get resolved, as the
> information from the globals graph, is never merged back in.
>
> It seems like extra overhead, to merge the information from the
> globals graph into each of the graphs after BU. But it seems to be
> needed for correct call graph construction.
>
> Views?

Is the DSCallGraph correct?  It may be correct behavior for the indirect
call site to not be resolved as long as call graph construction is correct.

-- John T.

>
> arushi

_______________________________________________
svadev mailing list
svadev AT cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/svadev