Svadev mailing list

[Jingyue Wu <wujingyue AT gmail.com>]

I did "make" from the test directory. I tried "make lit" just now and the problem still occurs.

I looked at print.c, and am wondering whether "XFAIL: *" conflicts with "RUNNO: diff". "XFAIL" expects the result to be non-zero, but "RUNNO" will return zero if the two outputs are different. Am I right? 

Jingyue

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Will Dietz <willdtz AT gmail.com> wrote:

This test is "supposed" to print different pointer values, but the way
the lit test is constructed this should not be causing you failures.

How are you running the tests?  The supported/expected way is "make
lit" from the test directory of your object tree.

~Will

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Jingyue Wu <wujingyue AT gmail.com> wrote:
> print.c.tmp.refout:
>
> @F 1234 1234 123.22 123.45
> @TEST ID3:AAAUnknown
> @TEST ID3:AAAUnknown 0x209f910
>
> print.c.tmp.refout:
>
> @F 1234 1234 123.22 123.45
> @TEST ID3:AAAUnknown
> @TEST ID3:AAAUnknown 0x159b8d0
>
> Jingyue
>
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Jingyue Wu <wujingyue AT gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The errors I see:
>>
>> /home/jingyue/Research/llvm/llvm-3.0/utils/lit/lit.py
>> /home/jingyue/Research/llvm/poolalloc-trunk/test --path
>> /home/jingyue/Research/llvm/poolalloc-trunk/Release+Asserts/bin -s -v
>> XPASS: PoolAlloc/DSA :: dsa/var_arg/print.c (120 of 133)
>> ******************** TEST 'PoolAlloc/DSA :: dsa/var_arg/print.c' FAILED
>> ********************
>> Script:
>> --
>> /home/jingyue/Research/llvm/llvm-3.0/Release+Asserts/bin/clang -O0
>> /home/jingyue/Research/llvm/poolalloc-trunk/test/dsa/var_arg/print.c -S
>> -emit-llvm -o - |
>> /home/jingyue/Research/llvm/llvm-3.0/Release+Asserts/bin/llvm-as >
>> /home/jingyue/Research/llvm/poolalloc-trunk/test/dsa/var_arg/Output/print.c.tmp.bc
>> /home/jingyue/Research/llvm/llvm-3.0/Release+Asserts/bin/lli
>> /home/jingyue/Research/llvm/poolalloc-trunk/test/dsa/var_arg/Output/print.c.tmp.bc
>> >
>> /home/jingyue/Research/llvm/poolalloc-trunk/test/dsa/var_arg/Output/print.c.tmp.refout
>> dsaopt
>> /home/jingyue/Research/llvm/poolalloc-trunk/test/dsa/var_arg/Output/print.c.tmp.bc
>> -ds-aa -O3 -o - |
>> /home/jingyue/Research/llvm/llvm-3.0/Release+Asserts/bin/lli >
>> /home/jingyue/Research/llvm/poolalloc-trunk/test/dsa/var_arg/Output/print.c.tmp.out
>> --
>> Exit Code: 0
>>
>> ********************
>>                          -- Testing: 133 tests, 4 threads --
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Will Dietz <willdtz AT gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Oh, those test/dsa/var_arg/*.c tests are terrible (at least in their
>>> present format).
>>>
>>> Strange.  Well, certainly don't worry about them.  I'm not sure what
>>> the right thing to do with them is.  They're marked XFAIL, so strange
>>> that you're seeing them give errors... :/.
>>>
>>> Could you forward me the errors you're seeing, if you get a chance?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> ~Will
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Jingyue Wu <wujingyue AT gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > svn up'ed, and there are still errors on dsa/var_arg/print.c.
>>> >
>>> > Jingyue
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Will Dietz <willdtz AT gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Yes, sorry.  I've always been hesitant to mark known failures as XFAIL
>>> >> (I suppose I'm worried they'll get lost that way), but I've gone ahead
>>> >> and done so to make it clear what's known/expected to fail and what's
>>> >> not :).
>>> >>
>>> >> We have bugzilla, after all.
>>> >>
>>> >> Sorry about that!
>>> >>
>>> >> ~Will
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Jingyue Wu <wujingyue AT gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > I checked out the latest trunk version, and found it failed with
>>> >> > dsa/callgraph/loop1.ll and dsa/callgraph/loop2.ll. Does this happen
>>> >> > to
>>> >> > you?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Jingyue
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:46 PM, John Criswell
>>> >> > <criswell AT illinois.edu>
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On 5/9/12 5:03 PM, Will Dietz wrote:
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Hi Jingyue, taking this off bugzilla since I believe this has gone
>>> >> >>> sufficiently off-topic, certainly for that particular bug report
>>> >> >>> :).
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 4:05 PM,<bugzilla-daemon AT llvm.org>  wrote:
>>> >> >>> [snip]
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> FWIW I believe John was suggesting you write some lit tests for
>>> >> >>> DS-AA,
>>> >> >>> not trying to run the test-suite (although that can be useful
>>> >> >>> too).
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Yes, I was suggesting that there be lit tests for ds-aa to help
>>> >> >> ensure
>>> >> >> that it keeps working.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> -- John T.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > Jingyue Wu
>>> >> > Department of Computer Science
>>> >> > Columbia University
>>> >> > New York, NY 10027
>>> >> > http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~jingyue
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Jingyue Wu
>>> > Department of Computer Science
>>> > Columbia University
>>> > New York, NY 10027
>>> > http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~jingyue
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jingyue Wu
>> Department of Computer Science
>> Columbia University
>> New York, NY 10027
>> http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~jingyue
>
>
>
>
> --
> Jingyue Wu
> Department of Computer Science
> Columbia University
> New York, NY 10027
> http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~jingyue

--
Jingyue Wu
Department of Computer Science
Columbia University
New York, NY 10027
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~jingyue