svadev AT lists.siebelschool.illinois.edu
Subject: Svadev mailing list
List archive
- From: Martin Richtarsky <ps1 AT martinien.de>
- To: svadev AT cs.uiuc.edu
- Subject: Re: [svadev] Using SAFECode with LLVM 3.1
- Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 14:23:46 +0200
- List-archive: <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/svadev/>
- List-id: <svadev.cs.uiuc.edu>
On 15.09.2012 21:50, John Criswell wrote:
On 9/15/12 2:07 PM, Martin Richtarsky wrote:
Hi,
is it posible to use SAFECode with LLVM 3.1 or even trunk?
We're currently in the process of updating SAFECode to LLVM mainline (i.e., trunk). We're hoping to have something basic working by early next week. After the update is done, we'll be tracking mainline until LLVM 3.2 is released.
Hi John,
that sounds great. Is it planned to make SAFECode a part of future LLVM releases (after 3.2)?
Does SAFECode currently implement all of the techniques mentioned here?
http://safecode.cs.illinois.edu/
What is the extent of the bounds checking? Are objects tracked with their corresponding memory accesses? From the papers on the site it sounds like it (and this would beat the generic redzone-type tracking done by valgrind or Address Sanitizer ).
Best regards,
Martin
- [svadev] Using SAFECode with LLVM 3.1, Martin Richtarsky, 09/15/2012
- Re: [svadev] Using SAFECode with LLVM 3.1, John Criswell, 09/15/2012
- Re: [svadev] Using SAFECode with LLVM 3.1, Martin Richtarsky, 09/16/2012
- Re: [svadev] Using SAFECode with LLVM 3.1, John Criswell, 09/16/2012
- Re: [svadev] Using SAFECode with LLVM 3.1, Martin Richtarsky, 09/16/2012
- Re: [svadev] Using SAFECode with LLVM 3.1, John Criswell, 09/15/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.