Charm++ parallel programming system

[Jim Phillips <jim AT ks.uiuc.edu>]

Try it without the mpicxx option first, though.  -Jim

On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Abhinav Bhatele wrote:

> It should work with most mpi installs as long as the include and lib files
> are in the usual places. If you have mpicc and mpicxx pointing to the intel
> compilers you can add that to the build like this:
>
> ./build charm++ mpi-linux-x86_64 mpicxx --with-production
>
> - Abhinav
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Bennion, Brian 
> <Bennion1 AT llnl.gov>
>  wrote:
>
> > Hello Abhinav,
> >
> > Thank you for the quick reply.  What flavor of mpi libraries do the builds
> > below assume is being used?
> > We have mpi wrappers for intel compilers that might need to be inserted
> > with the first two builds.
> >
> > Brian
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: 
> > bhatele AT gmail.com
> >  
> > [mailto:bhatele AT gmail.com]
> >  On Behalf Of Abhinav
> > Bhatele
> > Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 12:01 PM
> > To: Bennion, Brian
> > Cc: 
> > charm AT cs.uiuc.edu
> > Subject: Re: [ppl] [charm] Appropriate build type for LLNL linux clusters
> >
> > Hi Brian,
> >
> > You can try a couple different charm builds and then benchmark NAMD to see
> > which one gives you the best performance:
> >
> > ./build charm++ mpi-linux-x86_64 --with-production
> > ./build charm++ mpi-linux-x86_64 smp --with-production
> > ./build charm++ net-linux-x86_64 ibverbs --with-production
> > ./build charm++ net-linux-x86_64 ibverbs smp --with-production
> >
> > The smp builds of Charm/NAMD require slightly different runtime options
> > than the regular builds. Please e-mail us if you have any problems.
> >
> > - Abhinav
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Bennion, Brian 
> > <Bennion1 AT llnl.gov>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >        Hello,
> >
> >        I would like to build the proper version of charm++ for our linux
> > clusters in order to use NAMD2.8
> >
> >        Based on the specs listed on this website, which build parameters
> > would give me the best charm++ performance
> >
> >        https://computing.llnl.gov/?set=resources&page=OCF_resources#sierra
> >
> >        In the past, i have built namd/charm++ but the nodes then had only a
> > handful of cpus, now they are a bit more complicated.
> >
> >        Any suggestions would be helpful.
> >
> >
> >        brian bennion
> >
> >        _______________________________________________
> >        charm mailing list
> >        
> > charm AT cs.uiuc.edu
> >        http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/charm
> >        _______________________________________________
> >        ppl mailing list
> >        
> > ppl AT cs.uiuc.edu
> >        http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/ppl
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Abhinav Bhatele
> > Postdoctoral Research Staff Member
> > Center for Applied Scientific Computing
> > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
>
>
> --
> Abhinav Bhatele
> Postdoctoral Research Staff Member
> Center for Applied Scientific Computing
> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory