charm AT lists.siebelschool.illinois.edu
Subject: Charm++ parallel programming system
List archive
- From: "Bennion, Brian" <Bennion1 AT llnl.gov>
- To: Abhinav Bhatele <bhatele AT illinoisalumni.org>
- Cc: "charm AT cs.uiuc.edu" <charm AT cs.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: Re: [charm] [ppl] Appropriate build type for LLNL linux clusters
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:11:03 -0700
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- List-archive: <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/charm>
- List-id: CHARM parallel programming system <charm.cs.uiuc.edu>
So far only the vanilla mpi-linux-x86_64 version of charm++ will compile and
pass any tests.
The mpi smp will compile but segfaults when using simplearrayhello.
While the ./build tool recognizes the ibverbs option, there is no directory
for it in the arch/ directory in the charm6.2.1 tarball that I am using.
Brian
-----Original Message-----
From:
bhatele AT gmail.com
[mailto:bhatele AT gmail.com]
On Behalf Of Abhinav Bhatele
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 12:01 PM
To: Bennion, Brian
Cc:
charm AT cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [ppl] [charm] Appropriate build type for LLNL linux clusters
Hi Brian,
You can try a couple different charm builds and then benchmark NAMD to see
which one gives you the best performance:
./build charm++ mpi-linux-x86_64 --with-production
./build charm++ mpi-linux-x86_64 smp --with-production
./build charm++ net-linux-x86_64 ibverbs --with-production
./build charm++ net-linux-x86_64 ibverbs smp --with-production
The smp builds of Charm/NAMD require slightly different runtime options than
the regular builds. Please e-mail us if you have any problems.
- Abhinav
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Bennion, Brian
<Bennion1 AT llnl.gov>
wrote:
Hello,
I would like to build the proper version of charm++ for our linux
clusters in order to use NAMD2.8
Based on the specs listed on this website, which build parameters
would give me the best charm++ performance
https://computing.llnl.gov/?set=resources&page=OCF_resources#sierra
In the past, i have built namd/charm++ but the nodes then had only a
handful of cpus, now they are a bit more complicated.
Any suggestions would be helpful.
brian bennion
_______________________________________________
charm mailing list
charm AT cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/charm
_______________________________________________
ppl mailing list
ppl AT cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/ppl
--
Abhinav Bhatele
Postdoctoral Research Staff Member
Center for Applied Scientific Computing
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
- Re: [charm] [ppl] Appropriate build type for LLNL linux clusters, (continued)
- Re: [charm] [ppl] Appropriate build type for LLNL linux clusters, Bennion, Brian, 08/29/2011
- Re: [charm] [ppl] Appropriate build type for LLNL linux clusters, Abhinav Bhatele, 08/29/2011
- Re: [charm] [ppl] Appropriate build type for LLNL linux clusters, Jim Phillips, 08/29/2011
- Re: [charm] [ppl] Appropriate build type for LLNL linux clusters, Bennion, Brian, 08/29/2011
- Re: [charm] [ppl] Appropriate build type for LLNL linux clusters, Bennion, Brian, 08/29/2011
- Re: [charm] [ppl] Appropriate build type for LLNL linux clusters, Lee, Ian, 08/29/2011
- Re: [charm] [ppl] Appropriate build type for LLNL linux clusters, Bennion, Brian, 08/29/2011
- Re: [charm] [ppl] Appropriate build type for LLNL linux clusters, Abhinav Bhatele, 08/29/2011
- Re: [charm] [ppl] Appropriate build type for LLNL linux clusters, Lee, Ian, 08/29/2011
- Re: [charm] [ppl] Appropriate build type for LLNL linux clusters, Abhinav Bhatele, 08/29/2011
- Re: [charm] [ppl] Appropriate build type for LLNL linux clusters, Jim Phillips, 08/29/2011
- Re: [charm] [ppl] Appropriate build type for LLNL linux clusters, Abhinav Bhatele, 08/29/2011
- Re: [charm] [ppl] Appropriate build type for LLNL linux clusters, Bennion, Brian, 08/29/2011
- Re: [charm] [ppl] Appropriate build type for LLNL linux clusters, Bennion, Brian, 08/29/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.