patterns-discussion AT lists.siebelschool.illinois.edu
Subject: General talk about software patterns
List archive
RE: [patterns-discussion] Using Design Patterns without dynamic memoryallocation
Chronological Thread
- From: Andre Benassi <ralph_malph AT yahoo.com>
- To: Kencho san <kenchoweb AT hotmail.com>, patterns-discussion AT cs.uiuc.edu
- Cc:
- Subject: RE: [patterns-discussion] Using Design Patterns without dynamic memoryallocation
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:51:55 -0800 (PST)
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=FGt87MyXStrQDKwcdMDqNBnqC8rgWrZQWxN5M9whUIZ2zeNCfX6U/mWGp5J6lddP/la38f/kXcsS200pppwqXNX3vaTTEVEBnVXoGq7eaYg4qtX0wjdaguWvZitGEFSaoOsOR9GJ+8CY1DONh2R7yXmO8+Wh79J2zPSmWpw758g= ;
- List-archive: <http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/patterns-discussion>
- List-id: General talk about software patterns <patterns-discussion.cs.uiuc.edu>
Hi Kencho,
Thanks for your reply. I am still learning the
patterns, so I'll take a close look at the patterns
you mentioned.
The problem is not that we have limited memory, but
that we are not allowed to use dynamically allocated
memory (no heap). I have envisioned the use of
statically created objects in the place of dynamically
created ones, and I just wanted to make sure that it
made sense to do it that way in light of how the
patterns are implemented. It seems like I see a lot
of dynamic memory being allocated in the examples of
the books I have read (GoF, Head First DP), but I now
know that it is not usually a requirement but rather a
convenience or merely the "standard". There doesn't
seem to be much consideration for real-time systems in
the books I read, and most of them use Java, which is
right out for me.
Thanks again,
Andre
--- Kencho san
<kenchoweb AT hotmail.com>
wrote:
> I'm not sure what's your problem, but I'll try to
> answer.
>
> Almost any non-creational pattern can be aplied
> without dynamic memory
> allocation, for instance the template method, state
> pattern, facade,
> adapter... all of them can make use of
> composition-like relationships rather
> than reference relationships (note that reference
> doesn't mean dynamic
> memory allocation, but usually involves it)
>
> If your problem is about design patterns helping you
> avoid dynamic memory
> allocation (you have space for a maximum amount of
> objects and can't waste
> time or memory to store more...), I would suggest
> taking a look to the
> Object Pool pattern, which is a very clever way to
> reuse already existing
> objects instead of creating and destroying them
> constantly
>
> Hope that helps
>
> >Hello all, looking at archives I'm not sure how
> >"alive" this list is, but someone out there might
> be
> >listening.
> >
> >I'm interested in people's opinions as to whether
> >design patterns would be useful if you could not
> >dynamically allocate memory.
> >
> >I am new to patterns and find them quite
> interesting.
> >I am considering putting in some effort to
> comprehend
> >them, but my projects at work include embedded
> >safety-critical real-time systems, and one of the
> >things that we do not use is dynamic memory
> >allocation.
> >
> >If anyone has an opinion as to whether I should
> delve
> >into patterns for this type of software (i.e. you
> have
> >considered doing them and/or done them in similar
> >systems before) I'd be interested to hear it.
> >
> >Thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> >__________________________________
> >Do you Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
> >http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >patterns-discussion mailing list
> >patterns-discussion AT cs.uiuc.edu
>
>http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/patterns-discussion
>
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
- RE: [patterns-discussion] Using Design Patterns without dynamic memoryallocation, Sriram Gopalan, 03/28/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [patterns-discussion] Using Design Patterns without dynamic memoryallocation, Andre Benassi, 03/29/2005
- RE: [patterns-discussion] Using Design Patterns without dynamic memoryallocation, Jesús Alonso, 03/29/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.