General talk about software patterns

[Linda Rising <risingl AT tds.net>]

When Mary Lynn and I were working on the patterns for Fearless Change, 
we encountered cultural differences in many of our solutions. The most
startling one was "Do Food." We were informed by participants in one 
workshop that in their organization in Japan, you would never have food 
*AND*
discuss work-related topics during the day. Our Japanese friends said 
the Do Food pattern was better implemented after work in a pub. After 
that we heard from
others in companies around the world that the Pub pattern was preferred :-)!



On 2/19/2013 8:12 AM, Joseph Bergin wrote:
> I've been suggesting to my students for years that they write patterns in the 
> YOU form, as if addressed to the person who must carry out the solution. I've 
> also suggested that the solution be stated strongly in an imperative form. 
> Here is a tiny excerpt, derived from the pedagogical pattern Round Robin. 
> I'll leave out much of it, just to get the flavor:
>
> Round Robin
> Context: You are teaching a course in which students are expected to learn 
> through their discussions...
> Problem: You want all students to participate in a discussion.
> Solution: Therefore, use a round robin technique to solicit suggestions.
>
> I've always thought of this as a good form. However, I'm teaching the course again 
> and, as usual, learning a few things from my students. I have students from all 
> over the world. Some students from India and Pakistan questioned the use of the 
> YOU form for patterns. They say that it seems impolite to them, since the 
> solutions are imperative. There are language issues of course, with Urdu and Tamil 
> having separate you forms for use with different people. I think these words have 
> different import than the European versions (Usted, vs. tu). The European versions 
> seem mostly to represent "degree of association - strangers vs. family), or 
> the German impersonal forms (man), but it may be different (say, hierarchical) 
> elsewhere.
>
> As a result of the discussion, I've been playing with an I form (first person 
> singular rather than second person). For example:
>
> Context: I'm teaching a course in which students are expected to learn 
> through their discussions...
> Problem: I want all students to participate in a discussion.
> Solution: Therefore, I use a round robin technique to solicit suggestions.
>
> The rest of the pattern would need to be changed to match, of course.
>
> What do you think about all this? Have you heard this in your travels or 
> pattern writing/usage? The I form doesn't sound as strong to me, but 
> interesting. What advice would you give to pattern writers in this area?
>
> Linda Rising suggested I post this here, and Jutta gave good advice that she 
> may want to repeat here.
>
> Thanks for your thoughts.
> Joe
>
> PS. I'll be wanting three good shepherds pretty soon, also. Let me know, 
> privately, if you are interested.
> ---
> Joseph Bergin, Professor Emeritus in Residence
> Pace University, Computer Science, One Pace Plaza, NY NY 10038
> EMAIL 
> jbergin AT pace.edu
> HOMEPAGE http://csis.pace.edu/~bergin/
> ---
>         you shall above all things be glad and young.
>         For if you’re young, whatever life you wear
>         
>         it will become you;and if you are glad
>         whatever’s living will yourself become
>
>                 - - e. e. cummings
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> patterns-discussion mailing list
> patterns-discussion AT cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/patterns-discussion

--
Co-Author of Fearless Change: patterns for introducing new ideas
   http://www.fearlesschangepatterns.com

Check out my new web site
   http://www.lindarising.org